Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 5/20/16 7:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I guess my first question is whether we have consensus on the release
>> into which we should put this.  Some people (Noah, among others)
>> thought it should wait because we're after feature freeze, while
>> others thought we should do it now.  If we're going to try to get this
>> into 9.6, I'll work on reviewing this sooner rather than later, but if
>> we're not going to do that I'm going to postpone dealing with it until
>> after we branch.

> Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and 
> should be in that release.

Yes, let's fix it.  This will also take care of the questions about
whether the GIN/GIST opclass tweaks I made a few months ago require
module version bumps.
        regards, tom lane