Re: Run pgindent now?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Run pgindent now? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5561DB09.8010201@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Run pgindent now? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Run pgindent now?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/23/2015 11:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 04:16:07AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: >>> - if (IsA(node, Aggref) || IsA(node, GroupingFunc)) >>> + if (IsA(node, Aggref) ||IsA(node, GroupingFunc)) >>> >>> There's a bunch of changes like this. Looks rather odd to me? I don't >>> recall seing much code looking like that? >> Wow, that is quite odd. > No, pgindent has *always* been wonky about lines that contain a typedef > name but are not variable declarations. I've gotten in the habit of > breaking IsA tests like these into two lines: > > if (IsA(node, Aggref) || > IsA(node, GroupingFunc)) > > just so that it doesn't look weird when pgindent gets done with it. > You can see similar weirdness around sizeof usages, if you look. Well, that sounds like something we should try to patch, doesn't it? (No, I'm not volunteering.) cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: