Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 555FB182.4080108@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/22/2015 03:35 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-05-22 17:29:03 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote: >> On 5/22/15 4:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com> writes: >>>> On 5/22/15 3:08 PM, Eric Ridge wrote: >>>>> Rather than change the behavior of pg_cancel/terminate_backend(), why not change pg_stat_activity to exclude the currentsession? Seems like showing a row in pg_stat_activity for "SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity" is kinda useless anyways. >>> >>>> Interesting idea. I suspect that would be even more invasive than >>>> modifying the functions though... >>> >>> -1 ... some other columns in pg_stat_activity are potentially useful even >>> for the current session, eg session and transaction start times. >> >> AFAICT the only field you can get in pg_stat_activity and nowhere else is >> session start time (txn start is always now(), no?). >> >> If that's the only objection about eliminating the current backend from >> pg_stat_activity then I'd say we should just add a session_start_time >> function to handle that. > > That's far too big a backward compat break for something of very minor > benefit. > > This whole discussion seems to be about making it easier to run SELECT > pg_cancel_backend(pid) FROM pg_stat_activity;. But that shouldn't be > made easier! If anything harder. Linux doesn't prevent you from running Kill on your own process, either.Would be interesting to find out how their discussionon the same topic went. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: