Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 555CE451.7060607@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/20/2015 03:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes: >> Notably absent from the discussion is ODBC upon which JDBC was modelled and >> probably predates any use of ? as an operator > <historical-nitpicking> > > It would be a mistake to imagine that operators containing '?' are some > johnny-come-lately. The <?> operator for tintervals can be traced back > at least to Postgres v4r2 (1994), which is the oldest tarball I have at > hand. Most of the current list are geometric operators that were added > by Tom Lockhart in 1997. The only ones that aren't old enough to vote > are the JSONB ones we added last year. > > Not that the problem's not real, but these operators predate any attempt > to make Postgres work with ODBC or JDBC or any other connector. Otherwise > we might've thought better of using '?'. > > </historical-nitpicking> Yeah, I knew they were pretty old. When did the SQL standard add any mention of ? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: