Re: KNN-GiST with recheck
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: KNN-GiST with recheck |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5553A2FF.1030501@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: KNN-GiST with recheck (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: KNN-GiST with recheck
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/17/2015 12:05 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Tomas Vondra < >> tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >>> On 17.2.2015 14:21, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >>>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Korotkov >>>> <aekorotkov@gmail.com <mailto:aekorotkov@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Revised patch with reordering in GiST is attached >>>> (knn-gist-recheck-in-gist.patch) as well as testing script (test.py). >>> >>> I meant to do a bit of testing on this (assuming it's still needed), but >>> the patches need rebasing - Heikki fixed a few issues, so they don't >>> apply cleanly. >>> >> >> Both patches are revised. >> > > Both patches are rebased against current master. This looks pretty much ready. I'm going to spend some time on this on Friday, and if all looks good, commit. (Thursday's a public holiday here). One quick comment: It would be good to avoid the extra comparisons of the distances, when the index doesn't return any lossy items. As the patch stands, it adds one extra copyDistances() call and a cmp_distances() call for each tuple (in a knn-search), even if there are no lossy tuples. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: