Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5551.1063334034@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines
Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > The problem with waiting for 7.5 is that we will have no error reporting > when our non-spinlock code is being executed, and with Opteron/Itanium, > it seems like a good time to get it working. Well, as long as you're prepared to reduce the list of known supported platforms to zero as of 7.4beta3, and issue a fresh call for port reports. But it seems to me that this is mostly a cosmetic cleanup and therefore not the kind of thing to be doing late in beta. Couldn't we do something that affects only Opteron/Itanium and doesn't take a chance on breaking everything else? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: