Re: PostGIS spatial extensions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostGIS spatial extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 555.997912007@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostGIS spatial extensions (Paul Ramsey <pramsey@refractions.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Paul Ramsey <pramsey@refractions.net> writes: > However, if I have an RPM-based installation, I *will* have > the server headers I need. Why do we discriminate against people who > compile from the tarball? We don't. We do, however, assume that they read the installation instructions: The standard install installs only the header files needed for client application development. If you plan to do any server-side program development (such as custom functions or datatypes written in C), then you may want to install the entire PostgreSQL include tree into your target include directory. To do that, enter gmake install-all-headers This adds a megabyte or two to the install footprint, and is only useful if you don't plan to keep the whole source tree around for reference. (If you do, you can just use the source's include directory when building server-side software.) If Peter's notion of installing server-side headers into a separate subdirectory pans out, it might be worth thinking about installing all headers all the time. Right now I'd vote against it, on the grounds that it adds too much include-file clutter for something that very few people need. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: