Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5543E7CA.4080306@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?
Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/30/15 6:35 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Chris Rogers <teukros@gmail.com> wrote: >> Has there been any movement on this in the last couple years? >> >> I could really use the ability to optimize across CTE boundaries, and it >> seems like a lot of other people could too. > > I'm not aware that anyone is working on it. ISTR a comment to the effect of the SQL standard effectively requires current behavior. I'd still love to see a way around that though, even if it means some kind of additional syntax; WITH is a lot nicer way to factor a query than 10 nested subselects... -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: