Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5543706E.8020207@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2) (Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/1/15 5:58 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:24 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote: >> >> May 15th is the feature freeze, so that does give a little time. It's >> not clear to me what a "self-contained" part of the patch would be. If >> you have specific ideas on what could be broken out I'm interested to >> hear them. >> >> Patch v11 is attached with the changes discussed here plus some other >> improvements to the documentation suggested by Erik. >> > > For now, since pg_audit patch has a pg_audit_ddl_command_end() > function which uses part of un-committed "deparsing utility commands" > patch API, > pg_audit patch is completely depend on that patch. > If API name, interface are changed, it would affect for pg_audit patch. > I'm not sure about progress of "deparsing utility command" patch but > you have any idea if that patch is not committed into 9.5 until May > 15? Currently the deparse dependent code is ifdef'd so pg_audit compiles and operates just fine against master. Having the deparse code is nice because it allows less common object types to log with full-qualified names but it is in not a requirement for pg_audit. I'd like to see at least patch 0001 of deparse committed. Not only because it provides the functionality that deparse uses, but because it makes event triggers truly useful in pl/pgsql. -- - David Steele david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: