Re: Postgres restart in the middle of exclusive backup and the presence of backup_label file
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres restart in the middle of exclusive backup and the presence of backup_label file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 553d2348-1015-3546-2be8-b5a8a745dfa8@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres restart in the middle of exclusive backup and the presence of backup_label file (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres restart in the middle of exclusive backup and the presence of backup_label file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/2/21 11:00, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 12/1/21 19:30, Bossart, Nathan wrote: >> On 12/1/21, 10:37 AM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote: >>> On 12/1/21, 8:27 AM, "David Steele" <david@pgmasters.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/30/21 18:31, Bossart, Nathan wrote: >>>>> Do you think it's still worth trying to make it safe, or do you think >>>>> we should just remove exclusive mode completely? >>>> My preference would be to remove it completely, but I haven't gotten a >>>> lot of traction so far. >>> In this thread, I count 6 people who seem alright with removing it, >>> and 2 who might be opposed, although I don't think anyone has >>> explicitly stated they are against it. >> I hastily rebased the patch from 2018 and got it building and passing >> the tests. I'm sure it will need additional changes, but I'll wait >> for more feedback before I expend too much more effort on this. >> > > Should we really be getting rid of > PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::backup_fs_hot() ? Agreed, it would be better to update backup_fs_hot() to use exclusive mode and save out backup_label instead. Regards, -David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: