Re: forward vs backward slashes in msvc build code
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: forward vs backward slashes in msvc build code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 553E2AA7.1040409@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: forward vs backward slashes in msvc build code (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: forward vs backward slashes in msvc build code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/27/15 2:09 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > 2) I noticed that VC builds do not like *at all* file paths with > forward slashes, perhaps it could be possible to use a Condition like > hasForwardSlashes but it seems safer to simply enforce the file paths > to use backslashes in the vcproj files. That's inconsistent with the > vcxproj files, but it works and Mkvcbuild.pm works as before. > 3) I found why chkpass was needed as a dependency with libpgport and > libpgcommon, actually crypt.c needs to be listed as a unique file, so > it needs a fake entry in vcproj and vcxproj files. > All those things are corrected in the patch attached, tested with both > MS and VC. What's the difference between MS and VC? If VC doesn't accept forward slashes, doesn't that invalidate the premise of this patch? Is it worth attempting to maintain it?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: