Re: adding more information about process(es) cpu and memory usage
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: adding more information about process(es) cpu and memory usage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 553B40D5.30609@dalibo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: adding more information about process(es) cpu and memory usage (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: adding more information about process(es) cpu and
memory usage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le 24/04/2015 21:11, Jim Nasby a écrit : > On 4/24/15 6:29 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> The reason nobody's gotten around to that in the last fifteen years is >>> that per-process rusage isn't actually all that interesting; there's >>> too much that happens in background daemons, for instance. >> >> There's *some* stuff that happens in background daemons, but if you >> want to measure user and system time consume by a particularly query, >> this would actually be a pretty handy way to do that, I think. > > I more often am wondering what a running backend is doing OS-wise, but > being able to see what happened when it finished would definitely be > better than what's available now. There are at least two projects that provides this kind of statistics for backends: pg_proctab (https://github.com/markwkm/pg_proctab) and pg_stat_kcache (https://github.com/dalibo/pg_stat_kcache). Michael also wrote an article on this topic some weeks ago (http://michael.otacoo.com/postgresql-2/postgres-calculate-cpu-usage-process/). Regards -- Julien Rouhaud http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: