Re: pg_dump: largeobject behavior issues (possible bug)
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump: largeobject behavior issues (possible bug) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 553AD998.2070304@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump: largeobject behavior issues (possible bug) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/24/2015 03:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Given that large objects don't have any individual dependencies, > one could envision fixing this by replacing the individual large-object > DumpableObjects by a single placeholder to participate in the sort phase, > and then when it's time to dump that, scan the large objects using a > cursor and create/print/delete the information separately for each one. > This would likely involve some rather painful refactoring in pg_dump > however. Andrew G mentioned something about using a cursor for the main query that pulls the info. He said that it wasn't a solution but may be a bandaid (my words). Is that something we may want to look into as a stop gap? > > regards, tom lane > -- The most kicking donkey PostgreSQL Infrastructure company in existence. The oldest, the most experienced, the consulting company to the stars. Command Prompt, Inc. http://www.commandprompt.com/ +1 -503-667-4564 - 24x7 - 365 - Proactive and Managed Professional Services!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: