Re: tablespaces inside $PGDATA considered harmful
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tablespaces inside $PGDATA considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55395373.9030006@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tablespaces inside $PGDATA considered harmful (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: tablespaces inside $PGDATA considered harmful
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/23/15 11:01 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On April 23, 2015 6:12:05 PM GMT+03:00, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com> wrote: >> On 4/22/15 9:41 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> The case this doesn't catch is referencing a >>> symbolic link that points to the same directory. We can't make it an >>> error so people can use pg_upgrade these setups. >> >> Couldn't we make it an ERROR unless IsBinaryUpgrade? > > People still upgrade without pg upgrade. Yes, but only after creating a brand new cluster from scratch, which would then disallow them from putting tablespaces in $PGDATA. Or are you saying people do binary upgrades without pg_upgrade? I don't think we have any obligation to support that... -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: