Re: [BUGS] Failure to coerce unknown type to specific type
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Failure to coerce unknown type to specific type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55394CC9.5050703@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Failure to coerce unknown type to specific type (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Failure to coerce unknown type to specific
type
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/23/15 5:07 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > This is because parsing of UNION immediately converts constants > of unknown type in the UNION's both arms to text so the top level > select won't be bothered by this problem. But the problematic > query doesn't have appropriate timing to do that until the > function I patched. FWIW, I think that's more accidental than anything. I'm no expert in our casting and type handling code but I spent a lot of time stuck in it while working on the variant type, and it seems very scattered. There's stuff in the actual casting code, there's some stuff in other parts of parse/plan, there's stuff in individual types (array and record at least). Some stuff is handled by casting; some stuff is handled by mangling the parse tree. Something else I noticed is we're not consistent with handling typmod either. I don't remember the exact example I found, but there's cases involving casting of constants where we ignore it (I don't think it was as simple as SELECT 1::int::variant(...), but it was something like that). I don't know how much of this is just historical and how much is intentional, but it'd be nice if we could consolidate it more. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: