Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55391E64.1070103@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/23/15 11:06 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 23/04/15 17:45, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:45:38AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> Agreed, no extra file, and the same write volume as currently. It would >> also match pg_clog, which uses two bits per transaction --- maybe we can >> reuse some of that code. >> > > Yeah, this approach seems promising. We probably can't reuse code from > clog because the usage pattern is different (key for clog is xid, while > for visibility/freeze map ctid is used). But visibility map storage > layer is pretty simple so it should be easy to extend it for this use. Actually, there may be some bit manipulation functions we could reuse; things like efficiently counting how many things in a byte are set. Probably doesn't make sense to fully refactor it, but at least CLOG is a good source for cut/paste/whack. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: