Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 553917AB.8030007@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/20/2015 07:37 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > if (wco->commandType == CMD_INSERT) > command = "INSERT-applicable "; > else if (wco->commandType == CMD_UPDATE) > command = "UPDATE-applicable "; > else if (wco->commandType == CMD_DELETE) > command = "DELETE-applicable "; > else if (wco->commandType == CMD_SELECT) > command = "SELECT-applicable "; > > ereport(ERROR, > (errcode(ERRCODE_WITH_CHECK_OPTION_VIOLATION), > errmsg("new row violates %sWITH CHECK OPTION %sfor \"%s\"", > command ? command : "", > wco->secBarrier ? "(originally security barrier) ":"", > wco->viewname), > val_desc ? errdetail("Failing row contains %s.", val_desc) : > 0)); That code in ExecWithCheckOptions is not translatable. See style guide: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/nls-programmer.html#NLS-GUIDELINES - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: