Re: Turning off HOT/Cleanup sometimes
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Turning off HOT/Cleanup sometimes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5536B6D7.8030904@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Turning off HOT/Cleanup sometimes (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Turning off HOT/Cleanup sometimes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/21/15 10:04 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > One thing to consider is how we handle pruning of index scans that hit > multiple heap pages. Do we still write X% of the pages in the table, or > %X of the heap pages we actually access via SELECT? With the > write-then-skip approach, we would do X% of the pages we access, while > with the first-X% approach, we would probably prune all of them as we > would not be accessing most of the table. I don't think we can do the > first first-X% of pages and have the percentage based on the number of > pages accessed as we have no way to know how many heap pages we will > access from the index. This comment made me wonder... has anyone considered handing the pruning work off to a bgworker, at least for SELECTs? That means the selects themselves wouldn't be burdened by the actual prune work, only in notifying the bgworker. While that's not going to be free, presumably it's a lot cheaper... -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: