Re: Replication identifiers, take 4
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5534B835.1010402@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication identifiers, take 4
Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/17/2015 11:54 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > I've attached a rebased patch, that adds decision about origin logging > to the relevant XLogInsert() callsites for "external" 2 byte identifiers > and removes the pad-reusing version in the interest of moving forward. Putting aside the 2 vs. 4 byte identifier issue, let's discuss naming: I just realized that it talks about "replication identifier" as the new fundamental concept. The system table is called "pg_replication_identifier". But that's like talking about "index identifiers", instead of just indexes, and calling the system table pg_index_oid. The important concept this patch actually adds is the *origin* of each transaction. That term is already used in some parts of the patch. I think we should roughly do a search-replace of "replication identifier" -> "replication origin" to the patch. Or even "transaction origin". - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: