Re: Status of doc/pgjdbc.xml
От | dmp |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Status of doc/pgjdbc.xml |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5527E8EB.3030409@ttc-cmc.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Status of doc/pgjdbc.xml (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka wrote: > > What is the status the docbook documentation at doc/pgjdbc.xml? It seems > that people are still updating it[1], but the documentation on the website > comes from a completely different source[2] that is also being updated. > > Is there a point to keeping the docbook stuff if we're not going to put it > on the website? > > How do we ensure developers also update the documentation in the separate > www project? > > Kris Jurka > > 1) https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/commits/master/doc/pgjdbc.xml > > 2) https://github.com/pgjdbc/www/commits/master/documentation/documentation.md > I have deleted most of the general notes on the webpage conversion to using jekyll, but did keep a question.txt on the old web site. In there are two open issues that were not addressed in the conversion. * Documents/Changelog script make simpler to update/generate. * Development/Todo script make simpler to update/generate. The first as I recall, subject here, was that of getting docbook stuff to convert to a jeckyll format, markup language. As the note indicates my intial thoughts were some kinda of script. That was not carried through and a general discussion might be still in the mail list to that effect. This is something that I can not take on right now, and did not also then have the time. I will consider reviewing again if deemed necessary though, but not immediately. danap.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: