Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5527C4D1.9070808@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving
system columns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015/04/09 12:07, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > I'll update the patch, which will contain only an infrastructure for > this in the PG core, and will not contain any postgres_fdw change. I updated the patch based on your comments. Updated patch attached. In the patch the following FDW APIs have been proposed: + RowMarkType + GetForeignRowMarkType (LockClauseStrength strength); + bool + LockForeignRow (EState *estate, + ExecRowMark *erm, + ItemPointer tupleid); + HeapTuple + FetchForeignRow (EState *estate, + ExecRowMark *erm, + ItemPointer tupleid); I think that these APIs allow the FDW that has TIDs to use the rowmark options such as ROW_MARK_REFERENCE, ROW_MARK_SHARE and ROW_MARK_EXCLUSIVE for its foreign tables so as to match the local semantics exactly, for example. As you mentioned, it would be better to add helper functions to see whether the foreign table is referenced by any ExecRowMarks. ISTM that an easy way to do that is to modify ExecFindRowMark() so that it allows for the missing case. I didn't contain such functions in the patch, though. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: