Re: Parallel Seq Scan
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5524DAF8.3020603@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel Seq Scan (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel Seq Scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08-04-2015 PM 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote: > Going forward, I think we can improve the same if we decide not to shutdown > parallel workers till postmaster shutdown once they are started and > then just allocate them during executor-start phase. > I wonder if it makes sense to invent the notion of a global pool of workers with configurable number of workers that are created at postmaster start and destroyed at shutdown and requested for use when a query uses parallelizable nodes. That way, parallel costing model might be better able to factor in the available-resources-for-parallelization aspect, too. Though, I'm not quite sure how that helps solve (if at all) the problem of occasional unjustifiable resource consumption due to parallelization. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: