Re: count(*) performance improvement ideas
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: count(*) performance improvement ideas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5522.1208391659@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: count(*) performance improvement ideas ("Stephen Denne" <Stephen.Denne@datamail.co.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re: count(*) performance improvement ideas
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Stephen Denne" <Stephen.Denne@datamail.co.nz> writes: > Aside: It is currently more cumbersome to get a function to run, if needed, at commit. Ideal solution would be somethinglike "EXECUTE ON COMMIT my_function()" or maybe "SAVEPOINT my_name ON COMMIT my_function()", but these suggestionsare made without investigating what provision the SQL standard has made to address this need. There is none, and the reason seems pretty obvious to me. What if your "on commit" function fails? Or if you have two, and the second one fails? Or even more to the point, the second one does something that the first one expected to see the effects of? Transaction commit is an exceedingly subtle and carefully structured thing. Throwing random user-defined code into it ain't gonna happen. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: