Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 551ADE12.50900@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index
Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/31/2015 04:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I believe that Heikki said he'd backpatch that when 9.4 was considered >> very stable. I don't think that we've reached that level of confidence >> in the invasive B-Tree bugfixes that went into 9.4 yet. > > I have no intention to backpatch the changes. Too big, too invasive. I can certainly appreciate that. > Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed > very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth > the trouble anymore. If someone has runs into that issue frequently, he > probably should just upgrade to 9.4. Ouch. That is a really poor way to look at this. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: