Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5515.1168550182@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > I find it very unlikely that you would "during normal operations" end up > in a situation where you would first have permissions to create files in > a directory, and then lose them. > What could be is that you have a directory where you never had > permissions to create the file in the first place. > Any chance to differentiate between these? The cases we're concerned about involve access to an existing file, not attempts to create a new one, so I'm not clear what your point is. I would certainly *love* to differentiate between these failures and ordinary permissions failures, but so far as I've heard we can't. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: