Re: Index-only scans for GiST.
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index-only scans for GiST. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55143EE5.2050007@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index-only scans for GiST. (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/02/2015 12:43 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 02/27/2015 04:19 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: >> I add MemoryContext listCxt to avoid memory leak. listCxt is created once >> in gistrescan (only for index-only scan plan ) and reseted when scan of the >> leaf page is finished. >> >> I do not sure if the problem was completely solved, so I wait for feedback. > > Yeah, I think that solves it. On further testing, there was actually still a leak with kNN-searches. Fixed. > I spent a little time cleaning this up. I reverted that pageData change > so that it's an array again, put back the gist_indexonly.sql and > expected output files that were missing from your latest version, > removed a couple of unused local variables that gcc complained about. I > refactored gistFetchTuple a bit, because it was doing IMHO quite bogus > things with NULLs. It was passing NULLs to the opclass' fetch function, > but it didn't pass the isNull flag correctly. I changed it so that the > fetch function is not called at all for NULLs. > > I think this is pretty close to being committable. I'll make a round of > editorializing over the docs, and the code comments as well. > > The opr_sanity regression test is failing, there's apparently something > wrong with the pg_proc entries of the *canreturn functions. I haven't > looked into that yet; could you fix that? I have pushed this, after fixing the opr_sanity failure, some bug fixes, and documentation and comment cleanup. Thanks for the patch! - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: