RE: [SQL] Column name's length
От | Pham, Thinh |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [SQL] Column name's length |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 551413BBBB03D111BF880060B01AACCE0B38EE@home.priority.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [SQL] Column name's length
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Is there any reason you made OIDNAMELEN 260 instead of 256? Also, should i wait until 6.5 came out before trying to fix this thing? Since it looks like it's not going to be fixed in 6.5 either. I don't want to dump/reload this thing too many times since it stores a lot of other more critical data besides this timeclock thing. I saw the postgres website mentioned that 6.5 is coming out in around one week, is that true? Thinh > ----- > diff postgresql-6.4.2/src/include/postgres_ext.h > postgres-build/src/include/postgres_ext.h > 34c34 > < #define NAMEDATALEN 32 > --- > > #define NAMEDATALEN 256 > 37c37 > < #define OIDNAMELEN 36 > --- > > #define OIDNAMELEN 260 > ----- > diff postgresql-6.4.2/src/include/storage/buf_internals.h > postgres-build/src/include/storage/buf_internals.h > 87c87 > < #define PADDED_SBUFDESC_SIZE 128 > --- > > #define PADDED_SBUFDESC_SIZE 1024 > -----
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: