On 2015/03/23 2:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've committed this with some substantial rearrangements, notably:
Thanks for taking the time to committing the patch!
Thanks for the work, Hanada-san! And thank you everyone for the reviews
and comments, especially Ashutosh, Horiguchi-san and Noah!
> * I fooled around with the PlanRowMark changes some more, mainly with
> the idea that we might soon allow FDWs to use rowmark methods other than
> ROW_MARK_COPY. The planner now has just one place where a rel's rowmark
> method is chosen, so as to centralize anything we need to do there.
Will work on this issue.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita