Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 550DF5A4.40509@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | INT64_MIN and _MAX (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21/03/15 23:45, Andrew Gierth wrote: > A couple of places (adt/timestamp.c and pgbench.c) have this: > > #ifndef INT64_MAX > #define INT64_MAX INT64CONST(0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) > #endif > > #ifndef INT64_MIN > #define INT64_MIN (-INT64CONST(0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) - 1) > #endif > > On the other hand, int8.c uses the INT64_MIN expression directly inline. > > On the third hand, INT64_MIN etc. would typically be defined in stdint.h > if it exists. > > So wouldn't it make more sense to move these definitions into c.h and > standardize their usage? > I was thinking the same when I've seen Peter's version of Numeric abbreviations patch. So +1 for that. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: