Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website
От | John Scalia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5509B1BB.4000306@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website (<Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 3/18/2015 12:48 PM, Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de wrote: > John Scalia wrote on Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:07 PM: >> Or is some major flaw with 9.3.3 that should motivate us to get off it immediately? > Consider this: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1328517318.859752.1424472489522.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com > "Oh, and please update to 9.3.6; there are some nasty bugs fixed." Yikes, I see what you mean, even though we haven't experienced any issues with 9.3.3. You should all know that I personallyhave no problem upgrading at all and I've even put 9.4.0 into a sandbox just to satisfy my own curiosity. The problem here is more political, including the fact that Verizon is tryingto migrate off of postgresql. I'm reasonably certain if I say to migrate to a newer version, the suggestion will get canned, and the order come down to start using NuoDB instead.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: