Re: Benchmarking partitioning triggers and rules
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Benchmarking partitioning triggers and rules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5500B6AE.1070903@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Benchmarking partitioning triggers and rules (Tim Uckun <timuckun@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Benchmarking partitioning triggers and rules
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11.3.2015 21:43, Tim Uckun wrote: > Hey I hate to bump my post but I would really appreciate some input > on this benchmark. I am very alarmed that adding a very simple > partitioning trigger slows the insert speed by an order of magnitude. > Is there any way to speed this up? I think to actually give you a meaningful response, we really need more details about your configuration - what PostgreSQL version are you using, what configuration have you changed from the defaults and such. Anyway, you're right that triggers are not cheap. The numbers I get on the development version with a bit of tuning look like this: INSERT (direct) 1.5 sec INSERT 4.0 sec INSERT (EXECUTE) 11.5 sec So it's ~ what you've measured. Rules have the lowest overhead, but also there's a lot of tricky places. There's not much you can do, except for inserting the data directly into the right partition (without any triggers). -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: