Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5500B02C.5070406@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/11/15 1:29 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > What is this comment supposed to mean? There is no 'width_array'... > > > It is typo (I am sorry) - should be width_bucket(, array) > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=e80252d424278abf65b624669c8e6b3fe8587cac > > The code is similar, but it expect large **sorted** input. array_offset > works on unsorted (alphabetical unsorted) data sets - like days of week .. The functions are serving rather different purposes, so I'm not sure it's worth mentioning. If we do want to mention it, then something like the following should be added to *both* functions: * This code is similar to width_bucket() and * This code is similar to array_offset() Incidentally, isn't it bad that we're doing all these static assignments inside the loop in width_bucket? Or can we count on the compiler to recognize this? http://lnk.nu/github.com/1dvrr.c -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: