Re: Discourage splitting pg_wal directory

On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 11:32 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> "It is advantageous if the WAL is located on a different disk from the
> main database files. This can be achieved by moving the pg_wal directory
> to another location (while the server is shut down, of course) and
> creating a symbolic link from the original location in the main data
> directory to the new location."
>
> This is not as important as it used to be, and I would even hazard to
> say that we should not be encouraging it. There are still use cases for
> doing so, yes, but "advantageous" is too much. I played with some wording,
> but at the end of the day, I am thinking that we simply remove this
> paragraph entirely.

I think it is still a good idea to put data files and WAL on different file
systems.  Perhaps not so much with the intention of distributing I/O across
different disks, but to prevent the data files from filling the WAL disk.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe