Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size
| От | Adrian Klaver |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 54FDAD75.6070005@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size (pinker <pinker@onet.eu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 03/09/2015 07:08 AM, pinker wrote: > I did: select pg_cancel_backend(pid) from pg_stat_activity where usename <> > 'mine'; What makes you think that queries from usename = 'mine' are not important? Or to get back to the original request: What does select * from pg_stat_activity show? Also did the queries actually get cancelled? > > and then tried again vacuum full: > > INFO: vacuuming "my_table" > INFO: "my_table": found 0 removable, 3043947 nonremovable row versions in > 37580 pages > DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet. > CPU 1.07s/1.56u sec elapsed 3.24 sec. > Query returned successfully with no result in 6436 ms. > > > PostgreSQL 9.3.5 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.2 > 20140120 (Red Hat 4.8.2-16), 64-bit > > It was flash copy snapshot So what does that mean? In other words detail the steps you took to get the snapshot. > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: