Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54FB9340.3060105@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/7/15 6:02 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote: >> On 03/07/2015 05:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> On 2015-03-07 16:43:15 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: >>>> Semi-related... if we put some special handling in some places for bootstrap >>>> mode, couldn't most catalog objects be created using SQL, once we got >>>> pg_class, pg_attributes and pg_type created? That would theoretically allow >>>> us to drive much more of initdb with plain SQL (possibly created via >>>> pg_dump). >>> Several people have now made that suggestion, but I *seriously* doubt >>> that we actually want to go there. The overhead of executing SQL >>> commands in comparison to the bki stuff is really rather >>> noticeable. Doing the majority of the large number of insertions via SQL >>> will make initdb noticeably slower. And it's already annoyingly >>> slow. Besides make install it's probably the thing I wait most for >>> during development. >> >> My reaction exactly. We should not make users pay a price for >> developers' convenience. How often does a normal user actually initdb? I don't think it's that incredibly common. Added time to our development cycle certainly is a concern though. > Just to clarify, since Jim was responding to my comment, my thought was > *not* to use SQL commands inside initdb, but rather to use PG to create > the source files that we have today in our tree, which wouldn't slow > down initdb at all. Yeah, I was thinking SQL would make it even easier, but perhaps not. Since the other options here seem to have hit a dead end though, it seems your load it into tables idea is what we've got left... >>> That's besides the fact that SQL commands aren't actually that >>> comfortably editable in bulk. >> >> Indeed. > > No, they aren't, but having the data in a table in PG, with a way to > easily export to the format needed by BKI, would make bulk updates much > easier.. My thought was that pg_dump would be useful here, so instead of hand editing you'd just make changes in a live database and then dump it. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: