Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54FB8A15.5060504@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/07/2015 05:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-03-07 16:43:15 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: >> Semi-related... if we put some special handling in some places for bootstrap >> mode, couldn't most catalog objects be created using SQL, once we got >> pg_class, pg_attributes and pg_type created? That would theoretically allow >> us to drive much more of initdb with plain SQL (possibly created via >> pg_dump). > Several people have now made that suggestion, but I *seriously* doubt > that we actually want to go there. The overhead of executing SQL > commands in comparison to the bki stuff is really rather > noticeable. Doing the majority of the large number of insertions via SQL > will make initdb noticeably slower. And it's already annoyingly > slow. Besides make install it's probably the thing I wait most for > during development. My reaction exactly. We should not make users pay a price for developers' convenience. > > That's besides the fact that SQL commands aren't actually that > comfortably editable in bulk. Indeed. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: