Re: What do we need for new PUGs?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What do we need for new PUGs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54F72A3B.1000406@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What do we need for new PUGs? (Michael Alan Brewer <mbrewer@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Hello, I think the original requirements are pretty spot on, basically a way to communicate, meetup (g+ events) and have a general community area. I know I argued for easier mailing lists over on -www but as I think about it more, I start to wonder if .Org should just stay out of it. What I mean is, for .EU and .US, there are non-profits that can deal with it, and for intl communities that don't have a non-profit then that is where .Org steps in. At least from .US perspective we already have Gapps and G+ capability. That gives us everything meetup gives us (and more) for free. I can't speak for .EU but I am fairly certain that .US wouldn't mind stepping up to the plate (more) for the .US user groups. Heck the majority are already affiliated with .US anyway. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc Now I get it: your service is designed for a customer base that grew up with Facebook, watches Japanese seizure robot anime, and has the attention span of a gnat. I'm not that user., "Tyler Riddle"
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: