Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54F5F7DD.8020501@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/3/15 9:08 AM, Greg Stark wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> After sleeping on it, I realised that the code would return '{all}' for >> 'all' in pg_hba.conf, but '{"all"}' for '"all"'. So it's not exactly >> ambiguous, but I don't think it's especially useful for callers. > > Hm. Nope, it doesn't. It just says {all} regardless of whether "all" > is quoted or not. > > This makes sense, the rules for when to quote things in pg_hba and > when to quote things for arrays are separate. And we definitely don't > want to start adding quotes to every token that the parser noted was > quoted because then you'll start seeing things like {"\"all\""} and > {"\"database with space\""} which won't make it any easier to match > things. > > I'm not sure adding a separate column is really the solution either. > You can have things like all,databasename (which is the keyword "all" > not a database "all). Or more likely something like sameuser,bob or > even things like replication,all. What about a separate column that's just the text from pg_hba? Or is that what you're opposed to? FWIW, I'd say that having the individual array elements be correct is more important than what the result of array_out is. That way you could always do array_to_string(..., ', ') and get valid pg_hba output. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: