Re: Patch: raise default for max_wal_segments to 1GB
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: raise default for max_wal_segments to 1GB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54F561EF.5020206@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: raise default for max_wal_segments to 1GB (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: raise default for max_wal_segments to 1GB
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/03/2015 01:43 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-03-02 15:40:27 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: >> ! #max_wal_size = 1GB # in logfile segments > > Independent of the rest of the changes, the "in logfile segments" bit > should probably be changed. The "base unit" is still logfile segments, so if you write just "max_wal_size = 10" without a unit, that means 160MB. That's what the comment means. Is it needed? Many settings have a similar comment, but most don't. Most of the ones that do have a magic value 0, -1 as default, so that it's not obvious from the default what the unit is. For example: #tcp_keepalives_idle = 0 # TCP_KEEPIDLE, in seconds; # 0 selects the system default #tcp_keepalives_interval = 0 # TCP_KEEPINTVL, in seconds; # 0 selects the system default #temp_file_limit = -1 # limits per-session temp file space # in kB, or -1 for no limit #commit_delay = 0 # range 0-100000, in microseconds #log_temp_files = -1 # log temporary files equal or larger # than the specified size in kilobytes; # -1 disables, 0 logs all temp files #statement_timeout = 0 # in milliseconds, 0 is disabled #lock_timeout = 0 # in milliseconds, 0 is disabled #wal_keep_segments = 0 # in logfile segments, 16MB each; 0 disables But there are also: #wal_receiver_timeout = 60s # time that receiver waits for # communication from master # in milliseconds; 0 disables #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms # default vacuum cost delay for # autovacuum, in milliseconds; # -1 means use vacuum_cost_delay I propose that we remove the comment from max_wal_size, and also remove the "in milliseconds" from wal_receiver_timeout and autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay. (and we should also change wal_keep_segments to accept MB/GB, as discussed already) - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: