Re: Partitioning WIP patch
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioning WIP patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54EE7756.2050105@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partitioning WIP patch (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partitioning WIP patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/25/15 7:24 PM, Amit Langote wrote: >> >Does ALTER TABLE parent_monthly_xxxxx_201401 ADD COLUMN foo still >> >operate the same as today? I'd like to see us continue to support that, >> >but perhaps it would be wise to not paint ourselves into that corner >> >just yet. > Nothing prevents that from working, at least at the moment. Ok, but is that what we really want? If we release it that way we'll be stuck with it forever. I would certainly prefer that we support the capabilities of inheritance along with partitioning (because in some cases you want both). But it's going to limit what we can do internally. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: