Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 54D9223E.4040405@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup
Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 2/9/15 11:51 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > According to this page > <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/cc704588.aspx>, exception > 0xC0000005 means STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION - The instruction at 0x%08lx > referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s. This is not of > much help to me. In my experience that means that your data is corrupted. > I hope these additional bits of information can help someone figuring > out a solution to get my cluster up and running again. > > PS. I was thinking of reinstalling PGSQL over my current install but > keeping my PGDATA. I've done it in the past for fixing problems with > starting the service and it worked. What do you think? You could try it, but as Guillaume Drolet mentioned I don't see this helping. Since this is happening on your original database, I suspect that's what's been corrupted. In my experience, this means you either have faulty hardware, or there's a misconfiguration that means fsync isn't doing what it's supposed to do. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: