Re: Segfault on exclusion constraint violation
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Segfault on exclusion constraint violation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54CF9146.2040902@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Segfault on exclusion constraint violation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Segfault on exclusion constraint violation
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 02/02/2015 04:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes: >> 9.4 and master segfaults, if an insertion would need to wait for another >> transaction to finish because of an exclusion constraint. To reproduce: >> ... >> This only happens with assertions enabled. The culprit is commit >> f88d4cfc9d417dac2ee41a8f5e593898e56fd2bd, which added the 'ctid' >> argument to XactLockTableWait. check_exclusion_constraint calls >> index_endscan() just before XactLockTableWait, but that free's the >> memory the ctid points to. > >> I'll write up a patch to change those call sites to use local variables. >> Hopefully it's trivial enough to still include in 9.4.1, although time >> is really running out.. > > If the only known bad consequence requires assertions enabled, I think > it would be more prudent to *not* try to fix this in haste. Ok, I'll wait until after the release. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: