On 01/23/2015 03:00 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Why is the "last;" still there? AFAICS it matters in the old coding
> because of the while, but I don't think there is an equivalent looping
> construct in the new code.
>
You're right, I missed that. It shouldn't be there, and will produce an
error like
Can't "last" outside a loop block
cheers
andrew