Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 54C15124.6030304@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL (Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/22/15 11:13 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote: > Hi, > > As per discussion > <http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoDkds8Oqbr199wwrCp7fiDvOw6bbb+CGdwQHUF+gX_bVg@mail.gmail.com>, > I would like to proposal new view like pg_file_settings to know detail > of config file via SQL. > > - Background > In 9.4 postgresql.auto.conf is added to support ALTER SYSTEM command > and that config file is loaded after whenever postgresql.conf is > loaded. > That is, postgresql.auto.conf is quite high priority so that the value > in postgresql.conf can not work at all if DBA set it manually. > ALTER SYSTEM RESET command can remove the unnecessary value in > postgresql.auto.conf but there are no way to know about where the > value has came from. > (They can only give the information about the setting in last file it > is present.) > > - Solution > The patch not is implemented yet, just proposing now. > I'm imaging that we can have new pg_file_settings view has following > column to store current assigned value in config file. > - guc value name > - guc value > - config file path (e.g. /opt/data/postgresql.sql, > /opt/data/postgresql.auto.conf, /opt/hoge.conf) > This view could be convenient for DBA to decide if the > postgresql.auto.conf is useful or not and if it's not useful then DBA > could use ALTER SYSTEM .. RESET command to remove the same from > postgresql.auto.conf. Would this view have a row for every option in a config file? IE: if you set something in both postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf,would it show up twice? I think it should, and that there should be a way to see which setting is actuallyin effect. It looks like you're attempting to handle #include, yes? > Also other idea is to add additional columns existing view > (pg_settings), according to prev discussion. I think it would be useful to have a separate view that shows all occurrences of a setting. I recall some comment about source_fileand source_line not always being correct in pg_settings; if that's true we should fix that. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: