Re: Parallel Seq Scan
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54C08A1A.20109@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel Seq Scan (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 22-01-2015 PM 02:30, Amit Kapila wrote: >> Perhaps you are aware or you've postponed working on it, but I see that >> a plan executing in a worker does not know about instrumentation. > > I have deferred it until other main parts are stabilised/reviewed. Once > that is done, we can take a call what is best we can do for instrumentation. > Thom has reported the same as well upthread. > Ah, I missed Thom's report. >> Note the "Rows Removed by Filter". I guess the difference may be >> because, all the rows filtered by workers were not accounted for. I'm >> not quite sure, but since exec_worker_stmt goes the Portal way, >> QueryDesc.instrument_options remains unset and hence no instrumentation >> opportunities in a worker backend. One option may be to pass >> instrument_options down to worker_stmt? >> > > I think there is more to it, master backend need to process that information > as well. > I see. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: