Re: Strange choice of general index over partial index
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Strange choice of general index over partial index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54B85D32.7090106@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Strange choice of general index over partial index (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Strange choice of general index over partial index
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 16/01/15 11:30, Josh Berkus wrote: > This is an obfuscation and mock up, but: > > table files ( > id serial pk, > filename text not null, > state varchar(20) not null > ... 18 more columns > ) > > index file_state on (state) > (35GB in size) > index file_in_flight_state (state) where state in ( > 'waiting','assigning', 'processing' ) > (600MB in size) > ... 10 more indexes > > More important facts: > * state = 'done' 95% of the time. thereform the partial index > represents only 5% of the table > * all indexes and the table are very bloated > * server has 128GB RAM > * Version 9.2. > > Given this setup, I would expect the planner to *always* choose > file_in_flight_state over file_state for this query: > > SELECT id, filename FROM files WHERE state = 'waiting'; > > ... and yet it keeps selecting file_state based on extremely small > changes to the stats. This is important because the same query, using > file_state, is 20X to 50X slower, because that index frequently gets > pushed out of memory. > > What am I missing? Or is this potentially a planner bug for costing? > Are you seeing a bitmapscan access plan? If so see if disabling it gets you a plan on the files_in_flight index. I'm seeing this scenario with a fake/generated dataset a bit like yours in 9.2 (9.5 uses the files_in_flight w/o any coercing). regards Mark
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: