Re: BUG #12465: Materialized view dump restoration issue
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #12465: Materialized view dump restoration issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54B04581.1070906@joh.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #12465: Materialized view dump restoration issue (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #12465: Materialized view dump restoration issue
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2015-01-09 21:42, Tom Lane wrote: > jeff.casavant@gmail.com writes: >> Code to reproduce: > >> create function b() returns int as $$ select 1 $$ language sql; >> create function a() returns int as $$ select b() $$ language sql; >> create schema qwr; >> create materialized view qwr.c as select a(); > > This is not a pg_dump bug, this is a broken definition of function a(). > That function will fail in any context where the caller changes > search_path, not only pg_dump. You can perhaps get away without that > in a single-schema database, but not with multiple schemas. AFAIK there isn't a way to write inlineable SQL functions in relocatable extensions in that way, since you don't know which schema they end up installed in. The original test case comes from PostGIS. But I think the bigger problem is that naively thinking it shouldn't be this easy to create unrestorable databases. But perhaps I'm being overly naive. .marko
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: