Re: Proposal: two new role attributes and/or capabilities?
От | José Luis Tallón |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: two new role attributes and/or capabilities? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5499BBC2.9030705@adv-solutions.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: two new role attributes and/or capabilities? (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: two new role attributes and/or capabilities?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/23/2014 07:01 PM, David G Johnston wrote:<br /></div><blockquote cite="mid:1419357715258-5831868.post@n5.nabble.com"type="cite"><pre wrap="">[snip] So you want to say: GRANT IMPERSONATE TO bouncer; --covers the "ALL" requirement instead of GRANT victim1 TO bouncer; GRANT victim2 TO bouncer; etc... -- these would still be used to cover the "limited users" requirement ?</pre></blockquote><br /><code>GRANT IMPERSONATE ON actual_role TO login_role</code><br /><br /> would actually getus closer to how some other databases do, now that I think of it. This could be just some syntactic sugar.<br /> Mightdefinitively ease migrations, if nothing else.<br /><br /><br /> I appreciate the feedback. Thanks!<br /><br /><br /> / J.L.<br /><br />
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: