Re: tracking commit timestamps
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 548E9EC0.4080001@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tracking commit timestamps (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 15/12/14 09:12, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 02:23:39AM +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>> On 08/12/14 00:56, Noah Misch wrote: >>>> The commit_ts test suite gives me the attached diff on a 32-bit MinGW build >>>> running on 64-bit Windows Server 2003. I have not checked other Windows >>>> configurations; the suite does pass on GNU/Linux. >>> >>> Hmm I wonder if "< now()" needs to be changed to "<= now()" in those queries >>> to make them work correctly on that plarform, I don't have machine with that >>> environment handy right now, so I would appreciate if you could try that, in >>> case you don't have time for that, I will try to setup something later... >> >> I will try that, though perhaps not until next week. > > FWIW, I just tried that with MinGW-32 and I can see the error on Win7. > I also checked that changing "< now()" to "<= now()" fixed the > problem, so your assumption was right, Petr. > Regards, > Cool, thanks, I think it was the time granularity problem in Windows. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: