Re: Any better plan for this query?..
От | Dimitri |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5482c80a0905060549v33d59ec5y17479ba62117163e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any better plan for this query?..
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
The story is simple: for the launching of MySQL 5.4 I've done a testing comparing available on that time variations of InnoDB engines, and at the end by curiosity started the same test with PostgreSQL 8.3.7 to see if MySQL performance level is more close to PostgreSQL now (PG was a strong true winner before). For my big surprise MySQL 5.4 outpassed 8.3.7... However, analyzing the PostgreSQL processing I got a feeling something goes wrong on PG side.. So, now I've installed both 8.3.7 and 8.4beta1 to see more in depth what's going on. Currently 8.4 performs much better than 8.3.7, but there is still a room for improvement if such a small query may go faster :-) Rgds, -Dimitri On 5/6/09, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote: > Dimitri wrote: >> I've run several tests before and now going in depth to understand if >> there is nothing wrong. Due such a single query time difference InnoDB >> is doing 2-3 times better TPS level comparing to PostgreSQL.. > > Why don't you use MySQL then? > Or tune PostgreSQL? > > Yours, > Laurenz Albe >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: